Coverdell Plans
Myth #1: Coverdell accounts remain tax-free after 2010
As most 529 plan investors know, the current federal tax exclusion on qualified 529 withdrawals expires at the end of 2010. It is anticipated that Congress will ultimately act to extend the exclusion beyond the year 2010, there are no assurances. Many investors figure they do not have to worry about this problem with Coverdell accounts since their tax-free status for college purposes predates the 2001 Tax Act and its 2010 "sunset" provision. What these folks may not realize is that the old law exempted Coverdell account withdrawals only for taxpayers who chose not to claim the Hope or Lifetime Learning credit. Just about everyone was better off with the credit than with exemption of Coverdell account earnings.
Because of the sunset, this situation is scheduled to return in 2011, and those of us using Coverdell accounts for college will once again be forced to give up the Coverdell account exemption to claim the more valuable credit. We can only hope that Congress does the right thing so that families using either 529 plans or Coverdell ESAs don't have to pay tax on qualified withdrawals.
Myth #2: Coverdell accounts are less expensive than 529 plans
Many 529 plans impose asset-based program management fees, and some also impose fixed-dollar, annual account-maintenance fees. Although Coverdell accounts generally don't charge a separate asset-based fee, most do charge annual account fees. Because the amount that can be invested in an Coverdell account is limited to $2,000 per child per year, the affect of these fees on your investment return can be greater. A $20 annual account fee on a $2,000 Coverdell account balance is equivalent to a 1 percent expense ratio. Coverdell account costs could rise even further in the future as the IRS has made the record-keeping burden extraordinarily difficult for the Coverdell account administrators. Some mutual fund companies and brokerages such as Fidelity don't even offer Coverdell accounts, while some others do offer Coverdell accounts but require that you maintain a substantial balance in their other investment products to assure a profit.
Many states offer special tax breaks to residents using their own 529 plans, and these breaks can more than offset the program-level fees and expenses. By investing in your own state's 529 plan, you may be eligible for a tax deduction, a matching contribution or some other valuable incentive. You don't get these benefits with a Coverdell account.
Myth #3: Coverdell accounts are less confusing than 529 plans
Admittedly, the plethora of state-crafted 529 plans, along with their unique tax characteristics under federal and state law, can make the choice and use of 529 plans a rather confusing process. But Coverdell accounts also have some issues, even though they all follow the same basic model. Record keeping is one of the problems. The IRS may have figured it was doing everyone a favor when it recently switched the burden of maintaining Coverdell account tax-basis records from the investor to the plan provider. But the midstream change of direction is creating a record-keeping quagmire. For certain rollovers and taxable distributions, you will need to know the tax basis of your Coverdell ESA. Some investors, through no fault of the Coverdell account administrator, will not have the correct information.
Then there is the issue of excess contributions. Let's assume Dad decides to use the Coverdell account and plunks down $2,000 for his 4-year old daughter. But Grandma also wants to help, so she puts $2,000 into a separate Coverdell ESA for granddaughter. Together they have exceeded the annual contribution limit. Unless they somehow recognize the problem and retract the $2,000 excess contribution in time, the poor preschooler will be responsible for reporting and paying a 6 percent excise tax. That could lead to a restless naptime. The same problem occurs with contributions made by taxpayers who discover too late that their adjusted gross incomes exceeded certain limits.
Myth #4: You can maintain control with a Coverdell account
Many parents have set aside funds for college using Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA) accounts. The risk you take in establishing an UTMA is that your child gains direct control of the investment at a particular age established under state law, typically 18 or 21. With a Coverdell account, that particular problem appears to go away. The federal tax law permits a Coverdell account to remain under your control, provided you are designated the "responsible individual," until the Coverdell account beneficiary reaches age 30, at which time the balance must be paid out to the beneficiary. You can also change the beneficiary of the Coverdell account at any time to another family member under age 30. But lawyers familiar with this area say the whole concept of Coverdell account control is a fuzzy one. Questions of property ownership are decided under state laws, we're told, not federal tax law. But one thing is clear: The Coverdell account must be used for the benefit of the named beneficiary, and not for you, the donor or responsible individual. A 529 savings plan affords the ultimate level of control, placing no restrictions on your ability, outside of tax and penalty consequences, to use a withdrawal for whatever purpose you choose.
Myth #5: Coverdell accounts offer more investment flexibility
Actually, this is not a myth. You can have a self-directed Coverdell ESA, whereas a self-directed 529 account is not allowed. The myth may be that greater investment flexibility is a good thing. That will depend on your (or your financial adviser's) ability to select and maintain an investment portfolio appropriate to your education-savings objective. The portfolios available in most 529 savings plans are designed for that one objective.
Myth #6: Coverdell accounts offer a good financial aid result
The good news is that the U.S. Department of Education recently came out with a notice stating that Coverdell accounts will now receive the same favorable treatment that 529 savings plans receive in determining eligibility for federal student aid. In years past, the Coverdell account was disadvantageously considered the student's asset. The bad news is that the Education Department's former position makes more sense than their current position (see Myth No. 4 above). Coverdell account investors can only hope that the Education Department doesn't do another flip-flop. |